ICE Agent Held in Contempt After Arresting Defendant During Boston Trial
Boston, MA — A U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent was found in contempt of court by a Boston judge after arresting a defendant in the middle of an ongoing trial, sparking outrage among legal experts and reigniting the national debate over courthouse immigration arrests.
The arrest took place as Wilson Martell-Lebron, a defendant in a case involving alleged false information on a driver’s license application, exited the courthouse. ICE agent Brian Sullivan detained him just outside the courtroom, halting the legal proceedings before they could properly begin. Boston Municipal Court Judge Mark Summerville ruled that the arrest violated Martell-Lebron’s constitutional right to due process.
“This was a clear denial of the defendant’s right to be present at his own trial and face the witnesses against him,” Judge Summerville stated. “There’s nothing more serious in our justice system.”
As a direct result of the incident, the judge dismissed the charge against Martell-Lebron and initiated contempt proceedings against the ICE agent responsible.
Legal Proceedings Disrupted
Defense attorneys expressed alarm over how the arrest was handled. Ryan Sullivan, one of Martell-Lebron’s lawyers, claimed the ICE officers failed to properly identify themselves, creating confusion and fear in the middle of an already tense courtroom setting. “The timing and manner of this arrest are deeply disturbing,” he said. “Every person is entitled to a fair and complete trial.”
The trial had just begun, with opening statements delivered and initial witnesses preparing to testify when the arrest occurred. Martell-Lebron, originally from the Dominican Republic and residing in Massachusetts, was transferred to the Plymouth County detention center following his detention.
Tension Between City and Federal Enforcement
Boston has long maintained a “non-cooperation” policy when it comes to local law enforcement aiding federal immigration efforts. While city officers are not authorized to assist ICE agents, they are also directed not to interfere if a lawful federal arrest is being carried out.
According to court records, ICE informed both state police and local prosecutors ahead of the planned arrest. State officials later confirmed they followed standard protocol by neither aiding nor obstructing the operation.
Ryan Sullivan emphasized that if Martell-Lebron had been permitted to finish the trial, there would have been no motion to dismiss or take action against the agent. “We were ready to proceed,” he said.
National Debate Rekindled
The case has once again fueled debate over whether federal immigration authorities should be allowed to arrest individuals at courthouses. In previous years, informal ICE guidelines discouraged arrests in sensitive locations such as schools and courtrooms, but recent shifts in policy have led to more aggressive enforcement practices—even in legal venues.
It remains unclear whether additional legal or disciplinary consequences will follow the contempt ruling. The Suffolk County District Attorney’s office is currently reviewing the case and will determine whether further charges or sanctions should be brought against Agent Sullivan.
The incident has amplified calls for clear, enforceable boundaries between federal immigration enforcement and the American judicial process—especially when the stakes involve basic constitutional rights.